A Joint Judges’ Presentation, 23 April 2018

Written by: Martin Uden  |  Posted on: April 26th, 2018

The Society held an event on 23 April at the offices of Addleshaw Goddard in Moorgate featuring a British and a Korean judge explaining the two countries’ judicial systems.  Over 30 members and guests attended.

Judge David Saunders, Martin Uden, Judge Kim Min-Kyung

After an introduction by the Chairman and welcoming remarks by Graeme Warburton, partner at Addleshaw Goddard, Judge Kim Min-Kyung gave a presentation on the Korean judicial system.  She outlined the Korean legal system, explaining the hierarchy of courts and the importance of Korea’s written constitution guaranteeing the independence of the judiciary.  She explained that the Korean system of judicial appointments permits lifetime employment as a judge, with her own career as a judge starting at the age of 27, although there are moves underway which will prescribe greater prior professional experience and so later starting ages.

His Honour David Saunders gave a presentation from the point of view of the courts in England and Wales.  Even though the UK does not have a codified constitution, he stressed the importance of the oath taken by judges upon appointment, binding them to act “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.”  He outlined the courts hierarchy and explained the background and current styles of judicial dress, even though the bulk of his judicial career had been in tribunals where office dress was the norm.

There was an interesting exchange of views during the question and answer session, where the two judges were further assisted by His Honour Martin Griffith, who was in attendance as a guest of the Chairman.

The evening concluded with a drinks reception, with food generously provided by Addleshaw Goddard.

One Response

  1. joyputhussery says:

    the most important part of Korean judicial system which I attracted is” Korean legal system, explaining the hierarchy of courts and the importance of Korea’s written constitution guaranteeing the independence of the judiciary and the importance of the oath taken by judges upon appointment binding them to act “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.

Leave a Comment